Followers

Thursday, December 19, 2019

Hold the phone...

So I've been running around for the last few weeks, trying to keep up and manage a project almost every day, kids who are just going NUTSO 'cause it's almost Christmas (in case you didn't know) and just handling life. I have things to write about but then I get home and I'm tired and I have stuff to do and I go to bed early 'cause I get up at five (have I mentioned that?) and I end up not writing anything down.

Our school has a child who has some serious issues with her temper.

I can't judge how she's being handled/taken care of, I don't know her or her story.

I can tell you that she's really out of control physically and emotionally, based on my own observations.

Three times now she's been in the front office waiting for one of the aides to come get her for school. She's usually screaming loudly and rolling around, trying to knock people over like bowling pins. One of the office staff stands outside the doors and directs people to a different entrance. It's not peaceful.

 I came into work one afternoon a few weeks ago and the big desk phone that sits on my table was gone.

I walked to the office and asked if they had any idea what had happened to my telephone. They told me they'd check into it.

About five minutes later, one of the special education aides came in and got the phone out of a cabinet and gave it to me.

This is one of the aides I know fairly well, so I got a little bit of the story.
The child is physically aggressive and likes to throw things.
For whatever reason, she's fixated on phones.

I've been leaving the parent sign in and out table set up. Paperwork, decorations, tablecloth. I want my presence to be known by any stray educrats who may be wandering around.

Our principal has asked me to put all my stuff away each evening now, he was concerned that when the kid winds up, she's going to destroy whatever I have out. I guess the room we use for our after-school program is really the best place to bring her during her meltdowns, there's a door to close and it's mostly contained, although there is a door to the outside that has to be monitored. I've walked in to find chairs piled in front of it at least twice a week for a month or so now.

I've seen this particular third-grader in action several times. Week before last she was standing on the stairs, one handler above her and one below, trying to talk her down. She was fully aware of the chance to perform and the great acoustics and making the most of it, screaming and yelling and being as obnoxious as possible.

It would be hard to miss her entrance into the building each morning, too.
Her mom pulls up in front like all the other parents, and the fun commences. First, the child refuses to get out of the car. She sits in the front seat, shouting at her mother.

After 5 to 15 minutes of that, she gets out and stands by the van, door open, still shouting and arguing. Eventually she closes the door, then as her mom starts to drive away, she jumps in front of the van, causing her mom to suddenly slam stop.
More yelling. She'll do the suicide hop three or four more times.

This week on one of the days, Mom simply gave up trying to get the child out of the van and left. But she did not leave in an orderly fashion. She floored it, ran the stop sign on the way out of the lot and proceeded up the street, continuing to accelerate. I was glad that no kids were crossing. I get that she's frustrated, but when running over someone's kid is a possibility, she should probably go a little slower.

On the days she'll go in, it takes sometimes a half hour to 45 minutes for her to enter the building, where she does more yelling as she goes to her classroom.

She's fixated on telephones for whatever reason, and likes to throw them after she makes her three-times-a-day phone call to her mom or her dad. That's apparently one of her, what, privileges or conditions or whatever. Those calls are... odd. I overheard one a couple weeks ago.

I came into my little room and she was sitting with an aide at my table, using the phone.

She was using a weird (and LOUD) little baby voice and talking to her mom.  "I wuv you Mommy, see you in a widdle bit, now wet's hang up at the same time, okay, four twee two one," SLAM the receiver down.

She then turned to her handler and said in plain, unaffected words, "What are we going to do now?" No simpering at all.

But.
My understanding is that most days, after her phone call, she does her best to rip the phone out of the wall.

She will swing it by its cord and try to hit the aide assigned to her for the day. She screams, tears things off walls, throws anything that isn't attached and generally makes the immediate vicinity uninhabitable.

She has rampaged through the building, pulling telephones off desks and walls if she can get to one before someone stops her. In the front office, while they're trying to field calls from parents in the mornings, I've seen them leaned over their desk drawers with the handset up to an ear, ready to close the drawer if she comes in.

She hits the adults who are charged with her care.
She hits any children who are foolish enough to get into her general vicinity.
She completely refuses to do any type of school work.

I have never had to advocate for a special needs child.
My heart goes out to the parents and the kid, no one is 'winning' on this one.
I'm not sure that school is doing her any good. I know that she's disrupting the education of other kids, that she's not doing school work, and that she's a huge handful for everyone who's tasked with taking care of her. I've mentioned the aides we have who are a little gruff and noticed a couple of them actually working to escalate situations. I don't know if that's happening in this situation, but I would not be surprised to learn that it is. Also very unfair to the child.

There is no conclusion here.
No point to my rambling.
It's a tough situation for everyone involved.

12 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. I have no answers. I understand the idea of mainstreaming kids with special needs. And I have so much compassion for how difficult it must be for everyone involved. No one 'wins'. But I wonder about what's going on with other kids, too. Don't the other kids have a right to their education without fear of being attacked? Where is the line? If you remember Louis, it was a long time before he was transferred to a school that was better able to accommodate his needs.

      Delete
  2. Sounds not unlike to the situation my student teacher "enjoyed" this past semester - remove the violent swinging of phones, but keep the total disruptive behavior. Add leaving the classroom and wandering the corridors at will, with no one even bothering to stop the child, since it was such a relief when he left the classroom. Office staff not wanting to deal with in-school suspension, since he behaved no better for them than the classroom adults. This kid the district is just letting slide through, passing from grade to grade whether he does schoolwork or not, to get him to middle school in two years, where they DO have a behavioral program for kids like him, separate from the mainstream kids, too. It is sad that so many supports/options for kids who need them are gone now, all in favor of inclusion/mainstreaming. Not everyone benefits from it - certainly not the "regular" kids trying to get some work done while a classmates grabs their work or swings a plastic basket over their heads or interrupts every time they try to ask the teacher for help, etc. I have had kids both in the regular classroom and homeschooled AND removed from inclusion and schooled instead in schools for kids with autism etc. So I see both sides of the story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's been mentioned to me that school for this child is basically respite care for her parents. There may be truth to that, I don't know. If that's the reason she's there, though, she's not deriving anything immediately measurable. You can see how harried the staff is, too. And when people are harried and overworked, they can take it out on the kid. I sincerely hope that isn't happening.

      Delete
  3. Wow, I'm actually really surprised she's allowed to keep coming there. My grandson is 6 and the school he went to last year had a rule about being disruptive. Any loud laughing, talk, yelling ect got you sent home for the day. This year in a different school there's a no touching policy. Which means no hugging, no shaking hands, no holding hands and no patting on the back. My grandson has been sent home 6 times so far this year for hugging his best friend on Monday because they didn't see each other all weekend. The rules need to have some give. Sorry for the rant, it's just frustrating.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The SPED kids have different rules.
      The rules for neurotyical kids should be flexible, I agree. If both kids are fine with a hug, then leave them alone and let them have a hug! What kind of society has a rule about hugging or shaking hands or other physical contact? Only schools. My god, if we hadn't all been through an institutional education, who'd believe it?

      Delete
  4. I'm at a loss here. It's a conundrum. A really bad situation to which someone should find an answer --- for everyone!
    Wish I were that someone, but I'm not. The other students have rights, too, but I imagine the school would be in danger of a huge lawsuit if they tried to have her removed somehow.
    Mainstreaming can be both good and horrible, and this doesn't sound like the former. I sincerely feel for this girl and her family, and equally for the students, aides, and teachers she touches - both emotionally and physically!
    Is there a solution, with one person's rights affecting so, so many and so adversely, too. I feel you must have your own answers, but you've laid the situation out with your sympathy to everyone...just as you always do!
    Merry Whatevermas! Hope you have a good holiday!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Merry Christmas to you and yours.

      I don't have answers, usually. Mostly I have questions. And I question who 'wins' in this situation. Right now I am going with no one. No one wins. And everyone involved loses something. I fail to see how that's fair.

      Delete
  5. If there's one thing I've learned, it's that "fair" isn't promised anywhere. It's a beautiful thought. An ideal. Difficult to capture to where two parties agree equally. I know nobody "wins" here, but even "place" or "show" would be something. Doesn't a majority vote, (or what is best for the most), mean anything?
    Oh, I know it may not bring the "best" answer, but it means that one entity does not rule over all.
    Now why does that sound political when this isn't about politics!? :sigh:

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It doesn't really sound political, but I think it's an important point. The politically correct/kiss everyone's butt if they complain about how unfairly they're being treated mentality actually starts in school. The educratic establishment works hard to set the tone for our future by carefully indoctrinating everyone who's dragged through the system.

      Delete
  6. I was talking to Romeo about your post, and he felt that not removing her because everyone is afraid of a lawsuit is not valid. Anyone who endangers other kids and adults is justifiable. There must be something else preventing them from removing her from the school. That poor child needs therapy...or something.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, my understanding is that it's a process. They have to document a certain number of instances, document all the things they're doing under the IEP and prove they've done everything they can. Then the kid can be placed somewhere with a more therapeutic process. That's where Louis ended up. Finally.

      Delete

Would it kill you to comment?